Classification
Label messages and route them to the right queue.
Applied AI with control
I design workflows that use AI to interpret text or documents when a rule is not enough, with validation, traceability and human review where errors matter.
Problem it solves
AI can classify, extract and prepare, but it does not turn a probable answer into reliable data by itself.
The workflow must decide what can be automated, what is validated and what reaches a person.
Investment decision
Many similar emails or documents are reviewed.
Fields must be extracted from partly unstructured text.
The team classifies requests before working on them.
A draft saves time while a person retains the decision.
Frequent work
Scope should start with an observable problem and a clear way to verify the improvement.
Label messages and route them to the right queue.
Prepare structured fields from documents with validation.
Responses, summaries or reports for human review.
Query documentation with sources and visible limits.
Possible scope
Working criteria
Execution
I define acceptable error and who makes the final decision.
I prepare real examples and a small evaluation.
I build the workflow with controls and structured output.
I measure quality, cost and escalation cases.
Useful context
No. Often the value is in preparing and prioritizing while a person retains sensitive decisions.
With representative examples, quality criteria, execution cost and tracking of corrected or rejected cases.
The design should review what is sent, to which provider, for how long, and whether it can be minimized or anonymized.
Next step
A few real examples are usually enough to decide between AI, rules, an integration or a combination.